Decreased patient comorbidities and post-operative complications in technology-assisted compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The use of computer-assisted and robotic surgery was developed to improve component position and outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The goal of this study is to identify differences in patient demographics, comorbidities, and complications between technology-assisted and conventional TKA. METHODS: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to identify patients who underwent technology-assisted and conventional TKA from 2016 to 2018. Analysed variables include demographics, length of stay (LOS), payer-status, geographic region, comorbidities, complications, and mortality. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify differences between both groups. RESULTS: The analysis includes 2,208,434 TKA patients, of which 2,054,879 (93.05%) were conventional and 153,555 (6.95%) were technology assisted. Patients undergoing technology-assisted TKA were more likely to be older than 65 years, had higher median income quartile, and had surgery in urban teaching hospitals. Patients were less likely to undergo technology-assisted TKA if they were female gender, had Medicare payer status, were black race, were obese, were living in rural location, or had higher Charlson comorbidity score and baseline comorbidities. Technology-assisted TKA patients had shorter LOS, and fewer pulmonary and infection complications. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing technology-assisted TKA are being carefully selected with less baseline comorbidities, improved health, and living in urban areas. Subsequently, those carefully selected patients are discharged home, have a shorted hospital LOS, and have fewer complications compared to conventional TKA. Rural patients, black race and female gender are less likely to undergo technology-assisted TKA, further emphasizing the healthcare disparity for that segment of the population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level III.

The Statistical Fragility of Foot and Ankle Surgery Randomized Controlled Trials.

Fragility index (FI) is a metric used to interpret the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and describes the number of subjects that would need to be switched from event to non-event for a result to no longer be significant. Studies that analyze FI of RCTs in various orthopedic subspecialties have shown the RCTs to be largely underpowered and highly fragile. However, FI has not been assessed in foot and ankle RCTs. The MEDLINE and Embase online databases were searched from 1/1/2011 through 11/19/2021 for RCTs involving foot and ankle conditions. FI, fragility quotient (FQ), and difference between the FI and number of subjects lost to follow-up was calculated. Spearman correlation was performed to determine the relationship between sample size and FI. Overall, 1262 studies were identified of which 18 were included in the final analysis. The median sample size was 65 (interquartile range [IQR] 57-95.5), the median FI was 2 (IQR 1-2.5), and the median FQ was 0.026 (IQR 0.012-0.033). Ten of 15 (67%) studies with non-zero FI values had FI values less than the number of subjects lost to follow-up. There was linear association between FI and sample size (R2 = 0.495, p-value: .031). This study demonstrates that RCTs in the field of foot and ankle surgery are highly fragile, similar to other orthopedic subspecialties.

Differences in hospital length of stay and total hospital charge by income level in patients hospitalized for hip fractures.

This study examines the difference in length of stay and total hospital charge by income quartile in hip fracture patients. The length of stay increased in lower income groups, while total charge demonstrated a U-shaped relationship, with the highest charges in the highest and lowest income quartiles. INTRODUCTION: Socioeconomic factors have an impact on outcomes in hip fracture patients. This study aims to determine if there is a difference in hospital length of stay (LOS) and total hospital charge between income quartiles in hospitalized hip fracture patients. METHODS: National Inpatient Sample (NIS) data from 2016 to 2018 was used to determine differences in LOS, total charge, and other demographic/clinical outcomes by income quartile in patients hospitalized for hip fracture. Multivariate regressions were performed for both LOS and total hospital charge to determine variable impact and significance. RESULTS: There were 860,045 hip fracture patients were included this study. With 222,625 in the lowest income quartile, 234,215 in the second, 215,270 in the third, and 190,395 in the highest income quartile. LOS decreased with increase in income quartile. Total charge was highest in the highest quartile, while it was lowest in the middle two-quartiles. Comorbidities with the largest magnitude of effect on both LOS and total charge were lung disease, kidney disease, and heart disease. Time to surgery post-admission also had a large effect on both outcomes of interest. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that income quartile has an effect on both hospital LOS and total charge. This may be the result of differences in demographics and other clinical variables between quartiles and increased comorbidities in lower income levels. The overall summation of these socioeconomic, demographic, and medical factors affecting patients in lower income levels may result in worse outcomes following hip fracture.

Comparative analysis of authorship trends in the Journal of Hand Surgery European and American volumes: A bibliometric analysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to better understand the authorship publishing trends in the field of hand surgery. To accomplish this, a comparative analysis was completed between the European and American volumes of the Journal of Hand Surgery (JHSE and JHSA) over the past three decades. Well-established bibliometric methods were used to examine one representative year from each of the past three decades. The focus of the study was to examine changes in author gender over time as well as to compare authorship trends across the two volumes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All JHSA and JHSE publications from 1985, 1995, 2005, and 2015 were placed into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Data was collected for each publication including the gender of first and corresponding authors, corresponding author position, corresponding author country of origin, number of credited institutions, authors, printed pages, and references. Countries were grouped by regions. RESULTS: A total of 450 and 763 manuscripts from JHSE and JHSA, respectively, met inclusion criteria. JHSE and JHSA both showed increases in most variables analyzed over time. Both journals showed an increase in female first and corresponding authors. JHSE and JHSA displayed a rise in collaboration between institutions and countries. CONCLUSIONS: Both JHSE and JHSA display increasing female inclusion in the hand surgery literature, which has traditionally been a male dominated field. The observed increase in collaboration between institutions and countries is likely linked to advances in technology that allow sharing of information more conveniently and reliably than was previously possible. As further advances are made socially and technologically, hopefully these trends will continue, leading to faster and higher quality research being generated in the field of hand surgery.

Mid-Term Follow Up of Newer-Generation Morphometric Wedge Stems for Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA).

INTRODUCTION: Proximally coated, morphometric wedge femoral stems illustrated excellent survivorship and clinical outcomes at a minimum five-year postoperative follow up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We completed a retrospective review of 186 THA patients from three high-volume surgeons to assess clinical- and patient-reported outcomes five years after implantation with a cementless, proximally coated morphometric wedge femoral stem. We reviewed Gruen zones on early postoperative and mid-term radiographs for signs of osteolysis, loosening, and wear. Clinical- and patient-reported outcomes were compared with previously published two-year outcomes for these femoral stems. RESULTS: No progression of radiolucencies or loosening was observed radiographically when comparing minimum one-year and five-year follow up. Reactive radiodense lines were observed in 23 cases (12.64%), and 13 cases (7.14%) exhibited true radiolucencies of 1-3mm, and all remained unchanged between follow ups or were no longer present on the five-year film. Cortical hypertrophy was noted in Gruen zones 3 and/or 5 in 11 cases (6.04%). No stems were revised for mechanical loosening or for periprosthetic fracture. Nine (9) patients (4.87%) underwent revisions during the follow-up period for periprosthetic infection, femoral head and/or acetabular component revisions, and impingement requiring release and femoral head change. Average Harris Hip Scores were excellent at five years and improved slightly when compared to a two-year follow up; however, this change was not statistically significant. Health-related quality of life mental component and physical component scores were a mean of 48.45 and 43.10 at 5 years, respectively. All cause Kaplan-Meier survivorship of the femoral stem was calculated at 98.4% at an average 65.7 months post implantation. Additionally, this cohort exhibited 100% aseptic survivorship during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Newer-generation morphometric wedge femoral stems for THA exhibit excellent radiographic stability, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes five years post implantation.